I just watched the segment on CNBC cited in this article. I laughed out loud and understand that Dennis Gartman is a shill for the stock perma-bull network, which also happens to be the gold perma-bear network. CNBC parades these characters out every single day and proceeds to blow them right there on the air. It is obscene, but funny.
Mr. Dennis Gartman is a well-known investment newsletter writer who publishes an excellent daily commentary. In today’s issue, Mr. Gartman provided a comparison chart that was apparently prepared by Mr. Steve Cortes, a contributor to the cable TV network CNBC. Unfortunately we do not have permission or the ability to reproduce the comparison chart, but Mr. Gartman went on to comment about that chart:
“SANTAYANA WAS RIGHT: The American philosopher George Santayana said that those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it. In this light we have this chart, courtesy of fellow “Fast Money” contributor and very good friend, Mr. Steven Cortes, noting the correlation between gold’s action of late and that of 1980. The implications here are ominous for the gold bulls… indeed very.” – Dennis Gartman
We thought our Vulture readership might appreciate a letter we felt motivated enough to pen while vacationing. It follows below.
August 24, 2011
Hello Dennis, I have been vacationing away from my usual “battle station,” but please allow me to comment on the chart you reproduced in today’s TGL bySteve Cortes of CNBC.
The chart Mr. Cortes sent is kind of like a parlor trick. As if we can even use 1980 as a model at this point, we cannot, … in 1979 – 1980 the gold price advanced by roughly 240% in the final year, from roughly $250 to roughly $850.
The equivalent 1-year move for gold in today’s market would be August 2010 to August 2011. A year ago gold was roughly $1,250. An equivalent 240% move higher would have taken gold to $3,000, or about 56% higher than $1,917.
In the final two months of that 1980 event, gold surged more than 100% from roughly $400 to roughly $850.
The equivalent 2-month move for gold in today’s market would be June to August. Two months ago gold was roughly $1,550. Obviously, a roughly 100% surge in a blow-off gets one to more or less the same $3,000 place.
Do you see the parabola that consolidated in around Oct. of 1979 in the first chart below? That would have been a better comparison to today’s market percentage wise. (Roughly $280 to $440 or about 57%, but it was actually the second of two legs up that started at around $230.)
Mr. Cortes may be right about a correction now, however, one is overdue. Note the 17% correction which occurred in Oct-Nov of 1979 below in the first chart.
That’s roughly equivalent to a $325 dip today, or to around $1,590 or so, which is where I would think there would be overwhelming support in this environment.
One can see what followed that dip in the second chart.
The THIRD and final blow-off top shown in the second chart does not compare well to today in my humble opinion.
The current parabola bears little resemblance to the events of 1980 except as a fractal, but again, comparisons to 1980 are at best fractals and disregard the huge differences in the marketplace today.
Having said that, we will know if this pullback/correction is similar to 1980 very shortly. In two weeks. Notice that gold blew up when it peaked in 1980? Remember it collapsed $260 or so, or about $30% in two weeks. The equivalent today would be to about $1,342. I would be a buyer of gold at $1,342 in two weeks, Dennis. How about you?
Credit George Kleinman for the two charts below via Gold-Eagle.com.
See two charts below plus a current view.